[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (make-frame-visible), doesn't
From: |
Chris Moore |
Subject: |
Re: (make-frame-visible), doesn't |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:46:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
Jan Djärv <address@hidden> writes:
> It is commin X11 terminology at least. And it is even used in the
> documentation for raise-frame:
>
> "If frame is invisible or iconified, make it visible"
The difference there is that if the window is 'buried' then it is
shown, ie. made visible.
I guess I just have a different expectation of what making something
visible should mean. If there's an X11 term which means something
else then I guess it's OK to use that, but isn't it odd to refer to a
window you can't see as being visible? Maybe not. Australia's
visible and I can't see that at the moment on account of it being
buried down under. Hmmm. Just ignore me then. :)
- (make-frame-visible), doesn't, Chris Moore, 2006/11/28
- Re: (make-frame-visible), doesn't, Stefan Monnier, 2006/11/28
- Re: (make-frame-visible), doesn't, Jan Djärv, 2006/11/28
- Re: (make-frame-visible), doesn't, Chris Moore, 2006/11/28
- Re: (make-frame-visible), doesn't, Jan Djärv, 2006/11/28
- Re: (make-frame-visible), doesn't,
Chris Moore <=
- Re: (make-frame-visible), doesn't, Stefan Monnier, 2006/11/28
- Re: (make-frame-visible), doesn't, Chris Moore, 2006/11/28
- Re: (make-frame-visible), doesn't, Jan Djärv, 2006/11/29
- Re: (make-frame-visible), doesn't, Richard Stallman, 2006/11/29
- Re: (make-frame-visible), doesn't, Stefan Monnier, 2006/11/28
- Re: (make-frame-visible), doesn't, Lennart Borgman, 2006/11/28
- Re: (make-frame-visible), doesn't, Jason Rumney, 2006/11/28
- Re: (make-frame-visible), doesn't, Lennart Borgman, 2006/11/28
- Re: (make-frame-visible), doesn't, Richard Stallman, 2006/11/29
- Re: (make-frame-visible), doesn't, Jan Djärv, 2006/11/29