[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad copyright years
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: bad copyright years |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:22:29 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
Nick Roberts <address@hidden> writes:
> > PS Fun times ahead in 3 weeks when every single file in Emacs needs
> > "2007" adding to the Copyright years...
>
> Doesn't this make it a bit silly then to just to do it for 2006? Also now the
> year gets added to all files since the `package' is Emacs, it should be
> possible to `prime' the files e.g put and end-of-copyright marker in the line
> below 2006, so that successive years can be added with a script.
Why not make a new pre-test *now*, have it tested, and release 22.1 in *2006*.
No matter how much testing we do for 22.1, we'll have to make a 22.2 release
soon
after to fix some bugs...
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: bad copyright years, (continued)
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years, Kenichi Handa, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/08
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/08
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Nick Roberts, 2006/12/10
- Re: bad copyright years,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/11
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/08
- Re: bad copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Kenichi Handa, 2006/12/12
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/13
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/13
- Re: bad copyright years, Kenichi Handa, 2006/12/13
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/13