[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:43:40 -0500 |
I think volatile int is OK, I'm sure some systems don't define sig_atomic_t.
We could have configure determine whether sig_atomic_t exists,
but first let's try `volatile int' and see if that is enough.
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs, (continued)
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs, Stefan Monnier, 2007/01/13
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs, Jan Djärv, 2007/01/13
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs, Chris Moore, 2007/01/14
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs, Jan Djärv, 2007/01/15
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2007/01/23
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs, Chris Moore, 2007/01/24
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2007/01/24
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs, Jan Djärv, 2007/01/25
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs, Richard Stallman, 2007/01/25
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs, Jan Djärv, 2007/01/25
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs, Jan Djärv, 2007/01/09
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs, Chris Moore, 2007/01/10