Re: mention lgrep and rgrep in the docstring for grep

[Jan Djärv]

Richard Stallman skrev:
>     For doing a recursive `grep', sure the `rgrep' command.  For running
>     `grep' in the current directory sure `lgrep'.
>
> If we change that to
>
>     For doing a recursive `grep', see the `rgrep' command.  For running
>     `grep' in the current directory see `lgrep'.
>
> then it would be good.

I am confused.  What does lgrep really do that grep doesn't?  "in the current 
directory" doesn't seem to be the case, specifying */* to lgrep is perfectly 
OK.  lgrep seems to set -i (case independent) by default whereas grep doesn't. 
 Is that the difference?

        Jan D.