[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: miss spell in `accept-process-output' doc string
From: |
Stephen Berman |
Subject: |
Re: miss spell in `accept-process-output' doc string |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:43:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.97 (gnu/linux) |
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:46:04 +0200 martin rudalics <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>Now that I think about it, I realize that many Emacs users have not studied
>>>the advanced mathematics where they would encounter the term "iff".
>>>So I think it is better to avoid that term.
>>>
>>>(I was the one who introduced it into Emacs doc strings.)
>>
>>
>> I have added this to TODO for fixing post-22 release.
>>
>> ** Avoid using "iff" in doc strings.
>
> Even advanced mathematical textbooks usually explain this in an initial
> section. Maybe we could add a definition in the manuals.
How about in (emacs)Glossary and in (elisp)Documentation Basics ?
Steve Berman
- miss spell in `accept-process-output' doc string, Tetsuo Tsukamoto, 2007/04/10
- Re: miss spell in `accept-process-output' doc string, martin rudalics, 2007/04/10
- Re: miss spell in `accept-process-output' doc string, Tetsuo Tsukamoto, 2007/04/10
- Re: miss spell in `accept-process-output' doc string, Stefan Monnier, 2007/04/10
- Re: miss spell in `accept-process-output' doc string, Richard Matthew Stallman, 2007/04/11
- Re: miss spell in `accept-process-output' doc string, Kim F. Storm, 2007/04/11
- Re: miss spell in `accept-process-output' doc string, martin rudalics, 2007/04/12
- Re: miss spell in `accept-process-output' doc string,
Stephen Berman <=
- Re: miss spell in `accept-process-output' doc string, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/12