Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] muse?

[John Wiegley]

Chris Beggy <address@hidden> writes:

> I read here several months ago that emacs-wiki development should
> stop because muse would eclipse it and all that muse needed was a
> README file and more documentation.
>
> I started working with muse and it is good but missing some features
> and users.  I expected muse to catch up and pull ahead.  I'm glad
> emacs-wiki is moving forward.

Considering that muse is actually emacs-wiki 3.0, you can see why I
think continued work on emacs-wiki 2.x is unfortunate.  What Muse
lacks are a few peripheral features that can be implemented as a
module.  What emacs-wiki lacks compared to Muse could never be
remedied without a complete rewrite.

But your e-mail reminds me of the finishing touches needed on Muse.
Now that ledger (http://ledger.sf.net) is finished, I think I have
some time to finish those items, and to port planner and the other
packages to Muse.

John