Re: [emms-help] about emms-player-finished-hook

[William Xu]

Jorgen Schaefer <address@hidden> writes:

> William Xu <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Maybe emms-next-noerror is *not* "a good function to put in
>> `emms-player-finished-hook'." now? I suggest we directly call it after
>> emms-player-finished-hook?
>
> Hm. I'd want it to be customizable.
>
> Quick poll:
>
> `emms-player-next-hook' or `emms-player-next-function'?

`emms-player-next-function'. :-)

-- 
William

Sushido, n.:
        The way of the tuna.