[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fenfire-dev] JoDi article process
From: |
Tuomas Lukka |
Subject: |
Re: [Fenfire-dev] JoDi article process |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Sep 2003 12:48:42 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 12:42:37PM +0300, Benja Fallenstein wrote:
> Tuomas Lukka wrote:
> >Ok, the problem is that we have no merge. For text files, CVS can merge
> >pretty well but the current RDF format is bad: the RDF files have lots
> >of spurious textural changes that CVS can't deal with (such as the NSx
> >ids changing).
>
> I could easily write an RDF writer that does not have the NSx problem
> (~1 hour I think). Any other issues that would have to be considered?
Hmm, I guess that could do it, if we also agree about each of us changing
only certain things.
Suggestion:
1) Only I change the imported literature (I've so far spatially placed
the ones I've gone through suitably for myself, and would like to keep
it that way - we may need personal spaces)
2) we each have our own canvas or a separator line or something
Tuomas
- [Fenfire-dev] JoDi article process, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/09/02
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] JoDi article process, Asko Soukka, 2003/09/04
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] JoDi article process, Benja Fallenstein, 2003/09/04
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] JoDi article process, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/09/04
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] JoDi article process, Benja Fallenstein, 2003/09/04
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] JoDi article process,
Tuomas Lukka <=
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] JoDi article process, Benja Fallenstein, 2003/09/04
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] JoDi article process, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/09/04
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] JoDi article process, Benja Fallenstein, 2003/09/04
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] JoDi article process, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/09/05
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] JoDi article process, Benja Fallenstein, 2003/09/05
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] JoDi article process, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/09/06