Re: [Fgs-bs] More items

[Desired Username]

I thought it might stand for "old rating" and be
obsolete, but it that seems to not be the case.  I may
end up putting an fgs_rank and fgs_rating in there and
the slowly converting them all to that.

--- tps12 <address@hidden> wrote:
> Orating has to do with rating? Maybe you should add
> a "berating" command.
> 
> When I thought about match negotiation, I identified
> three different 
> "levels of specification" as a game went from posted
> to actually being 
> played. If you're figuring out ratings, then I'll
> probably just do game 
> negotiation (on the server side) as part of room
> functionality.
> 
> Desired Username wrote:
> > I started thinking about match negotiation and
> looking
> > at the code.  I figured out what I needed to
> change
> > when I realized the whole thing has to be done
> over. 
> > The current match nego code works on a p2p basis,
> if
> > you will.  Instead we need another global array
> (heh)
> > of open game challenges.  
> > 
> > In the mean time, I'm looking at the ranking mess.
> 
> > Would you believe that there are *six* different
> > variables here?  srank, rank, ranked, rated,
> rating,
> > orating.  
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Fgs-bs mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fgs-bs


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com