[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [pooma-dev] Cooperation between FieldStencil and Range?
From: |
James Crotinger |
Subject: |
RE: [pooma-dev] Cooperation between FieldStencil and Range? |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Sep 2002 09:14:15 -0600 |
The problem is that one can not, in general, deduce geometry information on a red-black type subgrid from the information on the underlying grid. Thus only Interval views of a Field yield a Field with geometry information. RB type calculations can be done on arrays, so you might want to change some of the calculations to be array-centric.
Jim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Norbert Nemec [mailto:address@hidden]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 9:02 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [pooma-dev] Cooperation between FieldStencil and Range?
>
>
> Hi there,
>
> it seems like FieldStencil does not work together with
> Range<N> domains? Is there a deep reason to that? I tried to
> look into the matter, but the problem definitely seems to be
> more than just a few specializations missing. The whole
> Engine<Dim, T, ApplyFieldStencil<Functor, _expression_> > has
> Interval<Dim> hardcoded.
>
> I need to do red-black updates on a field using a
> FieldStencil and I really have no idea how I should do that now.
>
> Ciao,
> Nobbi
>
> --
> -- _____________________________________Norbert "Nobbi" Nemec
> -- Hindenburgstr. 44 ... D-91054 Erlangen ... Germany
> -- eMail: <address@hidden> Tel: +49-(0)-9131-204180
>
- RE: [pooma-dev] Cooperation between FieldStencil and Range?,
James Crotinger <=