[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH] Fix ExpressionTest
From: |
Richard Guenther |
Subject: |
[PATCH] Fix ExpressionTest |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:50:55 +0200 (CEST) |
This fixes ExpressionTest by deleting all the strange stuff
from FieldStencilSimple and replacing it with something that
resembles Engine/Stencil.h View1/View2. In turn we use the
FieldStencilSimple make() that takes a domain and was modeled
after View2 in twoPt() in the test.
Tested with the two FieldStencil tests that are available (though that is
not much...), ExpressionTest (the twoPt stuff) and StencilTests (tests
divVertToCell).
More testcases which show what is expected to work appreciated, because
I don't really know the desired semantics of FieldStencilSimple (and
Stencil) wrt views and domains.
Obviously I don't use Stencils myself.
Ok?
Richard.
2004Aug24 Richard Guenther <address@hidden>
* src/Engine/Stencil.h: do bounds check only with
POOMA_BOUNDS_CHECK.
src/Field/DiffOps/FieldStencil.h: rewrite make(stencil,
expr), add make(stencil, expr, domain), kill similar
broken Accumulate stuff, update documentation.
src/Field/tests/ExpressionTest.cpp: use FieldStencilSimple::make
with domain argument, don't take view ourselves.
p
Description: Text document
- [PATCH] Fix ExpressionTest,
Richard Guenther <=