[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Devel] PureC
From: |
David Turner |
Subject: |
Re: [Devel] PureC |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Jun 2001 18:41:05 +0200 |
Hi Werner,
>
> David, what do you think about abandoning FT_IMAGE_TAG altogether?
> What was the original intention for it? A simple enumeration (as
> pointed out by Wolfgang) should also work.
>
It would completely break binary compatibility, since many client
applications are compiled with the enumeration values within !!
Regards,
- David