[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] Cleaning up ttinterp
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] Cleaning up ttinterp |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Oct 2014 08:25:02 +0200 (CEST) |
> Which other ones do you want documented? I don't see any value in
> documenting, eg, these, as they are very self-documenting:
Mhmm. Just for consistency, I would like to have
/*************************************************************************/
/* */
/* FLIPOFF[]: Set auto-FLIP to OFF */
/* Opcode range: 0x4E */
/* Stack: --> */
/* */
case 0x4E: /* FLIPOFF */
exc->GS.auto_flip = FALSE;
break;
/*************************************************************************/
/* */
/* DEBUG[]: DEBUG. Unsupported. */
/* Opcode range: 0x4F */
/* Stack: uint32 --> */
/* */
/* Note: The original instruction pops a value from the stack. */
/* */
case 0x4F: /* DEBUG */
exc->error = FT_THROW( Debug_OpCode );
break;
...
As you can see, the comment
Note: The original instruction pops a value from the stack.
would be lost otherwise.
Werner
- [ft-devel] Cleaning up ttinterp, Behdad Esfahbod, 2014/10/13
- Re: [ft-devel] Cleaning up ttinterp, Werner LEMBERG, 2014/10/14
- Re: [ft-devel] Cleaning up ttinterp, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2014/10/14
- Re: [ft-devel] Cleaning up ttinterp, Behdad Esfahbod, 2014/10/14
- Re: [ft-devel] Cleaning up ttinterp, Werner LEMBERG, 2014/10/15
- Re: [ft-devel] Cleaning up ttinterp, Behdad Esfahbod, 2014/10/15
- Re: [ft-devel] Cleaning up ttinterp,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [ft-devel] Cleaning up ttinterp, Behdad Esfahbod, 2014/10/15
- Re: [ft-devel] Cleaning up ttinterp, Werner LEMBERG, 2014/10/18
- Re: [ft-devel] Cleaning up ttinterp, Behdad Esfahbod, 2014/10/26
Re: [ft-devel] Cleaning up ttinterp, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2014/10/14