[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Sep 2016 17:15:36 +0200 (CEST) |
> Do you mind making this Mode 5 and using big hexadecimal index steps
> in all modes?
Hexadecimal index steps sound quite useful, indeed. Using `-e unic'
for Mode 5 makes also sense; however, what do you do if the font
doesn't have a Unicode cmap? Will you use the current implementation
as a fallback?
Werner
- [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2016/09/19
- Re: [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2016/09/23
- Re: [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal, Khaled Hosny, 2016/09/23
- Re: [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/09/24
- Message not available
- Re: [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal, suzuki toshiya, 2016/09/24
- Re: [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/09/24
- Re: [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2016/09/24
- Re: [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/09/24
- Re: [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2016/09/24
- Re: [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Message not available
- Re: [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal, suzuki toshiya, 2016/09/24
- Re: [ft-devel] ftview / ftstring proposal, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/09/24