I am working on generating GIF(s) for that blink effect
( with 2-3 different visualizations to highlight differences ).
Another thing I thing would be useful to visualize is let’s say we have
two glyphs A and A’ . We display A in a frame and when you click and hold
anywhere on the image A’ is displayed and when you release it A is back on.
Hello Arvinder!
> This is something I wasn't sure about when dealing with different
> rendering modes. Should the different modes be organized and
> displayed separately? For example, if the glyphs were displayed
> side-by-side (to be compact vs. a list), the general idea
> (considering mono, antialiased and lcd) would be:
>
> Font X - Mono
> [A][A'] [B][B'] [C][C']... (organized by id in this case)
> Font X - Antialiased
> [A][A'] [B][B'] [C][C']... (organized by id in this case)
> Font X - LCD
> [A][A'] [B][B'] [C][C']... (organized by id in this case)
>
> In comparison to a collated option which would look something like:
>
> Font X
> [A mono][A mono'] [C LCD][C LCD'] [A LCD][A LCD'] [B antialiased][B
> antialiased']... (organized by difference in this case)
>
> Should there be an option to switch between them?
Honestly, I don't know yet. I think we will know this as soon as
there is something to test in real life. If possible, make everything
as configurable as possible and start with, say, two different views.
Maybe you can even provide high-level _javascript_ functions (or
whatever) so that different views can be set up with just a few
functions?
Note that a great tool is blink comparison of images.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel