Re: [ft-devel] Fwd: buiding ttfautohint with cmake?

[Werner LEMBERG]

> IMO, what matters is not which specific memory allocator/deallocator
> is used (whether the defaults, or user provided ones), but that they
> match with one another (they are defined by the same library).
> 
> That’s why I like the simplicity of a TTF_autohint_done function.
> That’s just a one liner.

Well, yes, but what about the callbacks?  For example,
`TA_Info_Post_Func' expects that the user modifies entries allocated
with `malloc'.  For such cases I guess we actually *need* function
pointers to allocation rountines, right?


    Werner