freetype-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ft-devel] [freetype-2.9.1] FT_Init_FreeType is missing with cc on S


From: suzuki toshiya
Subject: Re: [ft-devel] [freetype-2.9.1] FT_Init_FreeType is missing with cc on Solaris x64
Date: Thu, 03 May 2018 22:55:15 +0900
User-agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100329)

Dear Kanazawa-san,

No, no :-) I apologize if my question made you confused.

The source of configure script is in shell script syntax
or m4 macro syntax. "#if..." does not work, because autotool
does not use C preprocessor. More complicated tests are
needed (because autoconf lacks an utility macro to test
the predefined C preprocessor macro).

Regards,
mpsuzuki

Kiyoshi KANAZAWA wrote:
> Dear Suzuki san,
> 
> Oh, it is my fault.
> It is has to be
> #if !defined(__SUNPRO_C)
> instead of
> #ifndef __SUNPRO_C
> ?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> --- Kiyoshi
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: suzuki toshiya <address@hidden>
> To: Kiyoshi KANAZAWA <address@hidden>
> Cc: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
> Date: 2018/5/3, Thu 21:52
> Subject: Re: [ft-devel] [freetype-2.9.1] FT_Init_FreeType is missing with cc 
> on Solaris x64
> 
> Dear Kanazawa-san,
> 
> BTW, I want to ask one of my question, just for curious.
> 
> suzuki toshiya wrote:
>>> diff -ur ../freetype-2.9.1.orig/builds/unix/configure.raw 
>>> ./builds/unix/configure.raw
>>> --- ../freetype-2.9.1.orig/builds/unix/configure.raw    2018-05-01 
>>> 19:35:09.000000000 +0000
>>> +++ ./builds/unix/configure.raw 2018-05-03 17:27:54.383361566 +0000
>>> @@ -313,7 +313,9 @@
>>>  #
>>>  AC_MSG_CHECKING([for -fvisibility=hidden compiler flag])
>>>  orig_CFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"
>>> +#ifndef __SUNPRO_C
>>>  CFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -fvisibility=hidden"
>>> +#endif
>>>  AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([],[])],
>>>                    AC_MSG_RESULT(yes),
>>>                    CFLAGS="${orig_CFLAGS}"
>> Excuse me, these changes for autotools look quite different from the syntax 
>> of
>> autoconf, it looks like C preprocessor. Have you ever resolved similar 
>> problem
>> by such patch for autoconf files?
> 
> Regards,
> mpsuzuki
> 
> 
> 
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]