[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Start points of contours & rasterizer [was: Need help on dvi
From: |
Tom Kacvinsky |
Subject: |
Re: Start points of contours & rasterizer [was: Need help on dvi |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:18:10 -0400 (EDT) |
I do not have the problem with /x from eurm10 nor with /X from eusm10. ftview
shows these glyphs properly. I think that the problem you are having with /x
and /X has not much to do with the rasterizer, but rathter, something in your
code... :(
I am still looking into the /integraldisplay problem in CMEX10. I am making
some progress there...
Tom
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000 address@hidden wrote:
> >In reply to Tom Kacvinsky <address@hidden>
> >>
> >>Well, I think I might be mistaken (go figure. me, wrong? ;).
> >>
> >>I have an OpenType version of CMEX10 that I made with Adobe's OT FDK. When
> >>I
> >>disassemble the CFF table, I see that the start point of /integraldisplay is
> >>exactly the same as the start point in the Type 1 PFA/PFB. Yet the CFF
> >>version
> >>of the font views properly with ftview, and the Type 1 version does not.
> >>Weird...
> >>
> >>Tom
> >>
> >
> >but wait, there's more!
> >
> >glyph 120 from eurm10.pfb (a small and innocent looking "x")
> >
> >also breaks my code
>
> and glyph 88 from eusm10...
>
> --
> Cesar Augusto Rorato Crusius __o __o __o __o __o
> Stanford University _`\<, _`\<, _`\<, _`\<, _`\<,
> e-mail:address@hidden (_)/(_) (_)/(_) (_)/(_) (_)/(_) (_)/(_)
> www.stanford.edu/~crusius
> o _ _ _
> __o __o __o __o /\_ _ \\o (_)\__/o (_)
> _`\<, _`\<, _`\<, _`\<, _>(_) (_)/<_ \_| \ _|/' \/
> (_)/(_) (_)/(_) (_)/(_) (_)/(_) (_) (_) (_) (_)' _\o_
>
> He who sacrifices functionality for ease of use
> Loses both and deserves neither
>