[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Membership
From: |
Martin Keegan |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Membership |
Date: |
Wed, 28 May 2003 15:38:36 +0100 (BST) |
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Andrew Savory wrote:
> > Redefining one's notion of "membership" does not give one a bigger voice.
> > If anything, it undermines one's credibility.
>
> Depends on the definition.
>
> If 'associate members' pay for their membership by registering with us and
> allowing us to use their details (as has already been suggested), I don't
> see how having thousands of them would undermine our credibility?
Redefining one's notion of "pay" does not give one ... [etc, etc]
Mk
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Membership, (continued)
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Membership, Andrew Savory, 2003/05/27
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Membership, Ramanan Selvaratnam, 2003/05/27
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Membership, MJ Ray, 2003/05/27
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Membership, Andrew Savory, 2003/05/27
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Membership, Martin Keegan, 2003/05/28
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Membership, Andrew Savory, 2003/05/28
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Membership,
Martin Keegan <=
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Membership, Ramanan Selvaratnam, 2003/05/28
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Membership, MJ Ray, 2003/05/28
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Membership, ian, 2003/05/27
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Membership, MJ Ray, 2003/05/27
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Membership, MJ Ray, 2003/05/27
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Membership, David Casal, 2003/05/28
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Membership, Andrew Savory, 2003/05/28
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Membership, ian, 2003/05/28
RE: [Fsfe-uk] Membership, Andrew Atkinson, 2003/05/21