[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Domain Names
From: |
Andy Halsall |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Domain Names |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Apr 2008 00:40:11 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
> Argh. Personally, domains which m/^.*uk.*\.(com|net|org)$/ make me want
> to tear my eyes out, I'd much rather have a .org.uk which doesn't
> contain "uk" in the name.
>
Ha
I find it handy occasionally because (when used at the end, as it should be)
at least UK organisations can have pronouncable acronyms (unlike the poor
Dutch or the evil french...) even if they all rhyme with duck....
Also I tend agree with tdobson about org.uk's. I like them in principal but in
reality.... not so much. I cant justify that though, I find them and .es
domains dubious for no good reason at all....
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
RE: [Fsuk-manchester] Domain Names, Andy Halsall, 2008/04/17
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Domain Names, Dave Page, 2008/04/17
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Domain Names,
Andy Halsall <=
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Domain Names, Simon Ward, 2008/04/18
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Domain Names, Simon Ward, 2008/04/18
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Domain Names, Noah Slater, 2008/04/18
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Domain Names, Simon Ward, 2008/04/18
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Domain Names, Noah Slater, 2008/04/18
Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Domain Names, Simon Ward, 2008/04/18
Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Domain Names, Lucy, 2008/04/18
Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Domain Names, Noah Slater, 2008/04/18
Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Domain Names, Simon Ward, 2008/04/18