fsuk-manchester
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fsuk-manchester] RMS on Swedish Pirate Party vs Free Software


From: Paul Waring
Subject: Re: [Fsuk-manchester] RMS on Swedish Pirate Party vs Free Software
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 17:37:06 +0100
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)

Simon Ward wrote:
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 04:06:17PM +0100, Pater Mann wrote:
Simon Ward wrote:
All software, regardless of how it is licensed during the
copyright term, should become free to the public.

should be protected such that it will always remain free software and
cannot be exploited by commercial companies for their own gain

When copyright expires I don’t believe free software and proprietary
software should be treated any differently:  The software becomes free
for _everyone_, free or proprietary.

Assuming of course that parts of the software aren't covered by other areas of intellectual property, such as patents or trademarks. Also, what happens if the source code is made available but not other components, such as images or database schemas? I could put the source code for sites I've worked on in the past into the public domain, but without the extra parts you wouldn't be able to run it.

Paul

--
Paul Waring
http://www.pwaring.com




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]