Re: Runtime library structure

[Rob Browning]

Andreas Rottmann <address@hidden> writes:

> - Have one shared lib with all the non-generated stuff that almost
>   every wrapset would need. This would include my runtime wrapper
>   stuff and probably g-wrap-wct.c; name this something like
>   libgwrap-runtime.

Sounds reasonable, depending on what's included.

> - For each wrapper shlib, directly link in the support functions
>   needed. I can see the need for explicitly compiling linking against
>   those support functions from other wrapsets, but I think we should
>   get rid of it (this is certainly possible with runtime wrapper
>   creation).
>
> - Can't a wrapset compile/link against a wrapset shlib? If it can, I
>   don't see a need for separation into support wrapper shared
>   libraries.

Can you elaborate on these a bit?  I'm not sure I completely
understood the proposal.

Thanks
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592  F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4