[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gcl-devel] relocation overflow
From: |
Camm Maguire |
Subject: |
[Gcl-devel] relocation overflow |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Nov 2002 22:26:30 -0500 |
User-agent: |
WEMI/1.13.7 (Shimada) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) Emacs/20.7 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN) |
Greetings! On ppc, GCL loads binary object modules at specific
address in its lisp core, relocating them via a call to
bfd_get_relocated_section_contents. This works in general, but in
certain cases of many such loadings and a large base executable, the
routine reports that function symbols in the module overflow on
attempted relocation. I thought this was a TOC issue, and could be
addressed via -mminimal-toc, but no dice. All tests thus far with gcc
2.95, but I'm inclined to think that 3.2 will be the same.
Does this problem ring a bell (and hopefully a solution) with anyone?
Take care,
--
Camm Maguire address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
- [Gcl-devel] relocation overflow,
Camm Maguire <=
- Message not available
- [Gcl-devel] Re: relocation overflow, Camm Maguire, 2002/11/20
- [Gcl-devel] Re: relocation overflow, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2002/11/20
- [Gcl-devel] Re: relocation overflow, Geoff Keating, 2002/11/20
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: relocation overflow, Camm Maguire, 2002/11/20
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: relocation overflow, Geoff Keating, 2002/11/21
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: relocation overflow, Camm Maguire, 2002/11/21
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: relocation overflow, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2002/11/21
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: relocation overflow, Camm Maguire, 2002/11/21
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: relocation overflow, Geoff Keating, 2002/11/21
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: relocation overflow, Camm Maguire, 2002/11/20