[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gcl-devel] Re: readline and axiom
From: |
Camm Maguire |
Subject: |
[Gcl-devel] Re: readline and axiom |
Date: |
28 Oct 2003 15:19:26 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Greetings!
"Page, Bill" <address@hidden> writes:
> Camm,
>
> Is it usual for GCL to ouput a long stream of messages
> following the
>
> (si::init-readline)
>
> call? What I see when I start the --endable-static image
> that was generated during the Axiom build after the
> (si::init-readline) is
>
> starting address -T 0x86b04c0 Finished loading ... gcl_readline.o
> T
> "Gcl"
> 1
> (":INTERN: ":STEP" .....
>
> etc. for about 200 lines of output or so
>
> ... "PUSH-OPTION-BINDING")
>
This is normal for the current readline implementation. The symbols
are those in the current package which could be available from
command-line completion. We could silence this I imagine.
I'd be most interested if you find any instability (e.g. segfaults) in
a static readline build.
Take care,
> After which readline actually does behave as I had
> hoped and allows me to edit.
>
> Regards,
> Bill Page.
>
> On Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:30 PM I wrote:
> >
> > On Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:03 PM you wrote:
> >
> > > ... readline library must be initialized at runtime via
> > > the lisp command:
> > >
> > > (si::init-readline)
> > >
> > ...
> > > Would be nice if you could report any readline functionality
> > > differences between the to ports, if any.
> > >
> >
> > Well, I did observe that when I start GCL 2.6.1 on windows,
> > I don't have to do anything to start readline. So I guess
> > the (si::init-readline) got executed somehow but it is not
> > in the GCL.BAT startup file.
> >
> > I'll let you know more once I actually see it work
> > under Linux.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Bill Page.
> >
>
>
>
>
--
Camm Maguire address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah