gcl-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: ia64 function descriptors and unexec


From: Camm Maguire
Subject: Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: ia64 function descriptors and unexec
Date: 29 Oct 2003 12:36:42 -0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2

Greetings, and thanks for your reply!

Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:

> Camm Maguire <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > To sum up the previous discussion, the ia64 linux ABI apparently
> > offers no opportunity for ld.so to ensure that function descriptors
> > remain constant, even over successive executions of the same binary on
> > the same machine.
> 
> There is no problem with statically initialized function pointers, only
> for assigned pointer at runtime.  The function descriptors for the former
> are generated at compile time and won't ever change.
> 

OK, but I need saved runtime-initialized function pointers.  Do you
have either a reference for how xemacs has handled this, or a contact
person who might know?  Was there ever a GNU emacs obstacle on ia64
linux, or am I confusing the situation with xemacs?

Take care,

> > I believe that this issue stood in the way of an emacs port to ia64
> > linux for some time,
> 
> There is no such problem with GNU Emacs.  Only XEmacs has this problem.
> 
> Andreas.
> 
> -- 
> Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
> SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 N├╝rnberg
> Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
> "And now for something completely different."
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire                                            address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]