Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcl and the random tester

[Camm Maguire]

Greetings!

"Paul F. Dietz" <address@hidden> writes:

> I wrote:
> 
> > Yes, it is worthwhile.  Currently these operators are conditionalized
> > out of the generator, so we can test without them.  Without them,
> > gcl doesn't have any compiler bugs that I know about that the random
> > tester can stimulate (although some might exist).
> 
> I just had gcl segfault on random tests (size 1000, arg num 8)
> after < 900 iterations.  Oh well.
> 

:-<. Can you please post the offending form, and the command you are
:using to run the tester.

Take care,

>       Paul
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire                                            address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah