[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2 benchmarks
From: |
Mike Thomas |
Subject: |
RE: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2 benchmarks |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Jun 2004 17:33:58 +1000 |
Hi Camm.
I ran the Gabriel benchmarks patched per your original email (ie, not
including changes which might have been applied after Paul's suggestions)
and with the makefile modified to use Windows CLISP 2.30's "-x" argument
rather than piping to a "-" command-line (which did not work).
For Corman CL 2.5 I had to do each benchmark by hand as I couldn't get the
":quit" command to work with stdio from the makefile - in other words, the
Corman results deserve to be taken with a substantial grain of salt as all
output goes directly to the console rather than to a file.
Needless to say there is no CMUCL/SBCL on Windows.
I didn't see your test machine specifications, but my results (compared with
CLISP) are broadly concordant with your's on Linux except for GCL
input/output which is markedly worse on Windows - this could skew the times
for tests with 1600 repeats or with small computation:I/O ratios.
The GCL timer granularity on my machine is roughly +/- 0.02 seconds, so
accumulating runtime benchmark results of that magnitude with Windows GCL
may be inaccurate eg:
>(time (sleep 0.025))
real time : 0.033 secs
run-gbc time : 0.033 secs
child run time : 0.000 secs
gbc time : 0.000 secs
NIL
>(time (sleep 0.025))
real time : 0.017 secs
run-gbc time : 0.017 secs
child run time : 0.000 secs
gbc time : 0.000 secs
NIL
>(time (sleep 0.3))
real time : 0.317 secs
run-gbc time : 0.317 secs
child run time : 0.000 secs
gbc time : 0.000 secs
NIL
>(time (sleep 0.3))
real time : 0.300 secs
run-gbc time : 0.300 secs
child run time : 0.000 secs
gbc time : 0.000 secs
NIL
Cheers
Mike Thomas.
Using a 2.4 GHz 512 Mb PI with Windows XP:
============================================================================
Test GCL 2.62 (s) CLISP 2.30 (s) Corman 2.5 (s) (CLISP/GCL) (Corman/GCL)
===================================================+========================
BOYER 7.450 107.703 15.861 | 14.5 2.1
BROWSE 15.000 NA 134.724 | NA 9.0
CTAK 4.250 12.047 9.124 | 2.8 2.1
DDERIV 5.700 24.625 7.192 | 4.3 1.3
DERIV 4.867 22.953 6.731 | 4.7 1.4
DESTRU-MOD 5.683 72.656 19.394 | 12.8 3.4
DESTRU 8.617 73.047 18.954 | 8.5 2.2
DIV2 5.033 31.328 6.670 | 6.2 1.3
FFT-MOD 0.650 139.047 NA | 213.9 NA
FFT 0.983 138.781 196.118 | 141.2 199.5
FPRINT 17.267 29.281 204.095 | 1.7 11.8
FREAD 9.833 10.750 143.479 | 1.1 14.6
FRPOLY 20.900 162.437 72.190 | 7.8 3.5
PUZZLE-MOD 3.267 152.344 61.768 | 46.6 18.9
PUZZLE 3.583 152.125 62.532 | 42.5 17.5
STAK 6.817 68.203 NA | 10.0 NA
TAK-MOD 2.667 85.625 4.654 | 32.1 1.7
TAK 3.083 83.656 4.527 | 27.1 1.5
TAKL 1.000 55.047 2.745 | 55.0 2.7
TAKR 2.250 38.703 6.777 | 17.2 3.0
TPRINT 13.033 32.578 528.728 | 2.5 40.6
TRAVERSE 36.300 880.406 199.521 | 24.3 5.5
TRIANG-MOD 48.900 2067.016 862.122 | 42.3 17.6
TRIANG 52.283 1692.109 476.243 | 32.4 9.1
===================================================+========================
- [Gcl-devel] Re: BLAS and GCL, Camm Maguire, 2004/06/07
- [Gcl-devel] C library support [ was Re: BLAS and GCL ], Camm Maguire, 2004/06/08
- Re: [Gcl-devel] C library support [ was Re: BLAS and GCL ], Michael Koehne, 2004/06/08
- Re: [Gcl-devel] C library support [ was Re: BLAS and GCL ], Eric Merritt, 2004/06/08
- Re: [Gcl-devel] C library support [ was Re: BLAS and GCL ], Dennis Decker Jensen, 2004/06/08
- [Gcl-devel] Re: C library support [ was Re: BLAS and GCL ], Paul F. Dietz, 2004/06/08
- [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2 benchmarks, Camm Maguire, 2004/06/14
- Re: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2 benchmarks, Camm Maguire, 2004/06/14
- Re: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2 benchmarks, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/06/14
- Re: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2 benchmarks, Camm Maguire, 2004/06/17
- RE: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2 benchmarks,
Mike Thomas <=
- Re: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2 benchmarks, Camm Maguire, 2004/06/21
- RE: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2 benchmarks, Mike Thomas, 2004/06/21
- Re: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2 benchmarks, Camm Maguire, 2004/06/22