[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] islisp standard
From: |
Camm Maguire |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] islisp standard |
Date: |
02 Jul 2004 12:52:14 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Greetings, and thanks!
OK, in addition, as far as I can (weakly) see, of these three, common
lisp is the dominant dialect, and is likely to become more so in the
future. Would you agree with such a statement, given that of course
no scientific statement of this sort is possible?
Take care,
"Paul F. Dietz" <address@hidden> writes:
> Camm Maguire wrote:
>
> > Greetings! Just wondering if the islisp specification is close enough
> > to that of common lisp for its documentation to be a useful base for
> > ours. I'm thinking the answer is no.
> > How many lisp dialects are still in wide use? What approximate
> > 'share' belongs to common lisp?
>
> I don't know islisp.
>
> AFAIK, Common Lisp, Scheme and emacs lisp are in fairly widespread use.
> There may be lisps associated with some commercial products (like
> Autocad) but I don't know about those.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
--
Camm Maguire address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah