Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures

[Paul F. Dietz]

Camm Maguire wrote:
> Thanks again!  As you can tell, I'm trying to save on the
> pre-evaluations if possible.  Simplest would be to pull all args into
> a let*, but ...
>
> I think this is fixed now, but would always appreciate your comment.
> This version pre-evaluates in a let* all a) cons args whose car is not
> 'quote, and b) non-constant atom args which appear anywhere to the
> right (at any nesting level).  This should work, right?

There's a new problem:

Test MISC.450 failed
Form: (FUNCALL (COMPILE NIL
                        '(LAMBDA (A B)
                           (MIN 0 (REDUCE #'MIN (VECTOR A B 0)) 0)))
               -10 -1)
Expected value: -10
Actual value: #<CONDITIONS::INTERNAL-UNBOUND-VARIABLE.2>.

        Paul