[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gcl-devel] Re: nag from July

From: Paul F. Dietz
Subject: [Gcl-devel] Re: nag from July
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 20:46:41 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050920

Camm Maguire wrote:
 If not, we need to expand compile and function
to accept arguments in the other lambda forms, that is if the spec
allows.  Paul?

COMPILE does not specify what happens if the definition argument
is not a lambda expression or function, which means the behavior
is undefined.  That means the implementation is free to do as it

The same is true of the special operator FUNCTION (however,
there are restrictions when the name is a function name
not defined in the current lexical environment.)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]