[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gcl-devel] Re: time in gcc to call a pointer to a function
From: |
Camm Maguire |
Subject: |
[Gcl-devel] Re: time in gcc to call a pointer to a function |
Date: |
25 Mar 2006 17:41:36 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Greetings! Still looking into this, but it does appear that the
example I sent had some gcc code elimination. If so, this still
leaves the issue of mutual recursion -- how important is this? what
if function calls are somewhat slowed to attain it -- how much would
be worth it if any?
Take care,
Robert Boyer <address@hidden> writes:
> I seem to recall a conversation years ago in which Schelter said that for
> gcc, the difference in time between (1) a function call of a pointer to a
> function and (2) a function call of a function was nothing more than one
> instruction, the time it takes to fetch that to which the pointer pointed.
> Of course, my memory could be wrong, etc., etc. But this seems still
> plausible to me. So I'd be most happy to be re-educated.
>
> Bob
>
>
>
--
Camm Maguire address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Gcl-devel] Re: time in gcc to call a pointer to a function,
Camm Maguire <=