[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.8 licensing
From: |
Matt Kaufmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.8 licensing |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Nov 2010 05:30:41 -0600 |
I believe that ACL2 is GPLv2 in that same sense (except we do
occasionally put up CCL images as well).
-- Matt
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
From: Raymond Toy <address@hidden>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 06:28:10 -0500
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: user-0c99ag2.cable.mindspring.com
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
Cc: Donald Winiecki <address@hidden>, address@hidden
Sender: address@hidden
X-SpamAssassin-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0
X-UTCS-Spam-Status: No, hits=-124 required=165
On 11/5/10 9:52 AM, Camm Maguire wrote:
> Greetings, and thanks so much for this!
>
> I've been asked to query -- are there any GPLv2 only projects using
> GCL? If so, please now so state.
I think maxima is GPLv2 only. GCL isn't the only Lisp that can be used
with maxima, but it has historically been the main lisp used to create
binaries.
Ray
_______________________________________________
Gcl-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
- [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.8 licensing, Camm Maguire, 2010/11/04
- [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.8 licensing, Donald Winiecki, 2010/11/04
- [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.8 licensing, Camm Maguire, 2010/11/05
- [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.8 licensing, Raymond Toy, 2010/11/08
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.8 licensing,
Matt Kaufmann <=
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.8 licensing, Camm Maguire, 2010/11/08
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.8 licensing, Matt Kaufmann, 2010/11/08
- [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.8 licensing, Raymond Toy, 2010/11/09
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.8 licensing, Camm Maguire, 2010/11/15