Dear Wen,
The convex numbering depend only on the mesh, so it is the same,
yes. However, the dof numbering in a P0 discontinuous fem is not
the same as the numbering of convexes. The correspondance is given
by the mesh_fem object.
Yves.
Le 04/03/2014 21:26, Wen Jiang a écrit :
Dear Yves,
Thanks and I agree it will not be difficult. I think we could
compute the gradient on a discontinuous fem with p-1 order and
then use
convex_to_point
to get the corresponding elements attached to a node. The
convex_to_point returns a container of the convex in the mesh
structure and my question is that is the order(numbering) of
convex in the mesh the same as the one in continuous fem and
the discontinuous fem suppose they are defined on the same
mesh? Thanks.
Regards,
Wen
--
Yves Renard (address@hidden) tel : (33) 04.72.43.87.08
Pole de Mathematiques, INSA-Lyon fax : (33) 04.72.43.85.29
20, rue Albert Einstein
69621 Villeurbanne Cedex, FRANCE
http://math.univ-lyon1.fr/~renard
---------