getfem-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Getfem-users] question about nitsche


From: Yves Renard
Subject: Re: [Getfem-users] question about nitsche
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:49:50 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0


Dear Wen,

Yes, the term D_u G[v] is the directional derivative of  "G" in the direction "v". Of course it is simply G(v) if the problem to be solved is linear.

The term  (Hu-g).(Hv)/ \gamma  prescribe the condition itself, The term HG.Hv cancel the Neumann term in the corresponding direction in order to be consistent (without this term, the formulation is simply a non-consistent penalization of the Dirichlet condition). It is simply obtained by the integration by part when passing from the strong formulation of the problem to the weak one.
Finally, the term \theta(Hu-g)H D_u G[v] is added such that the formulation derive from a potential energy for \theta = 1 (and variational problems).

Yves.




On 13/10/2015 17:00, Wen Jiang wrote:
Hi Yves,

I am reading the document about the Nitsche's method for Dirichlet boundary conditions. (http://download.gna.org/getfem/html/homepage/userdoc/model_Nitsche.html)

I do not quite understand the weak form in the "Generic Nitsche's method for a Dirichlet condition" section. Could you explain the third term HG \dot Hv and the last term HD_u G[v]? Does the D_u mean the derivative of G[v]? 

Thanks,
Wen


_______________________________________________
Getfem-users mailing list
address@hidden
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/getfem-users


-- 

  Yves Renard (address@hidden)       tel : (33) 04.72.43.87.08
  Pole de Mathematiques, INSA-Lyon             fax : (33) 04.72.43.85.29
  20, rue Albert Einstein
  69621 Villeurbanne Cedex, FRANCE
  http://math.univ-lyon1.fr/~renard

---------

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]