|
From: | Andrew Haley |
Subject: | Re: [gforth] Fwd: anonymous inline word definitions |
Date: | Wed, 05 Dec 2012 09:48:41 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120911 Thunderbird/15.0.1 |
On 12/05/2012 02:13 AM, John Earnest wrote: > Any thoughts about how one would go about doing that portably? With a > little sugar and a fairly significant amount of plumbing it would be > possible to provide lexical capture of local variables surrounding > quotations via such a mechanism. We've discussed this at some length on comp.lang.forth; I guess you missed it. It'd be somewhere between difficult and impossible to do portably. Andrew.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |