[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[gfsd]Re: Cobol missing on webpages and non-existent links.
From: |
Tim Josling |
Subject: |
[gfsd]Re: Cobol missing on webpages and non-existent links. |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Feb 2001 21:17:20 +1100 |
Paul Visscher wrote:
>
> > Case #2
> >
> > http://www.gnu.org/software/cobol
> > says:
> >
> > How you can help
> >
> > The main need is for people with C skills to write runtime routines
> > eg sort/merge. Contact the project via the link below and we can
> > arrange for a task large or small, simple to extremely complex,
> > depending on the time and experience you can bring to bear on the
> > project.
> >
> >
> > But there is no "link below".
>
I am quite happy for this to be changed to "the link above" which
would be correct.
> The Cobol for GCC page has no contact information(other than address@hidden
> and address@hidden) and there was no mention of cobol in
> fencepost:/gd/gnuorg/maintainers. I followed a link from
> http://www.gnu.org/software/cobol/gnu-cobol.html to SourceForge and
> found that Tim Josling is the project admin; I've CCed him on this
> message.
By all means add me to the contacts list on gnu.org. At present
it is not too hard to find but this would not hurt. I am happy to
make these changes if you like - who should I send them to?
>
> I don't think we want GNU projects hosted on sourceforge---isn't that
> what savannah.gnu.org is for?
>
It is on source forge. RMS suggested I consider moving it, which
I did (consider it). I had just moved the project and did not
feel like going through all that again. Since I have written most
of the code for the project (lots) I reserve the right to host it
just exactly wherever I please. Source forge has lots of useful
features I didn't find on savannah. RMS decided to anoint it as
GNU COBOL knowing it was on source forge - he did not make an
issue of it.
> > Case #3
> >
> > There is nothing related to COBOL in the Free Software Directory, and
> > there are at least three projects that can be seen at the pages
> > previously mentioned.
>
Happy to add it in as long as it is made clear it is not ready
for serious use at present.
>
> --paulv
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature