[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster application

From: Gerry Reno
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster application
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 08:21:17 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20061219)

This is my initial attempt at clustering outside of just 2-node HA. Originally I think that OCFS2 was targeted as providing access to shared storage array such as iSCSI but I think it is becoming more general. GFS appears somewhat more advanced right now than OCFS2 but is more complex. But again I have not installed either of these, just from my readings. The goal for me is to have all files/data be local and not just shared access so that there are no io bottlenecks during access and io performance will be very high. For this GlusterFS seems like it might work. My cluster filesystem has to be able to ride on top of LVM2 and I would like that this is simplified by an LVM2 management layer so that I don't have to change the configs on every single cluster node whenever I want to expand/contract a logical volume. I should be able to change the LVM2 config on just one node and it should automatically migrate to all other nodes dynamically. This is missing with GlusterFS. I think I can have this with GFS with their lvm2-cluster management tool. OCFS2 appears able to migrate the LVM2 metadata but only during cluster startup so you have to bring the cluster down except for one node to make any changes to LVM2. You make the LVM2 changes on the one node and then you can restart the cluster and those changes should be migrated throughout the cluster. This is what my research shows anyway. So since GlusterFS is not tightly tied into the kernel perhaps they will not be able to do such things. But maybe there can be other tools that could be used to fill in the gap. Something like a generic lvm2-cluster tool that would work for other types of clusters not just GFS. I'm going to wait for Feb 28 release before I start experimenting with GlusterFS. I'll probably try to setup some testbed using Xen doms.


jeffrey macdonald wrote:
    I use FC6 as well, but not the xen kernel.  It works
but i was not able to get the performance/io-threads stuff working (yet).
I was going to try again with the next pre-release.

fuse loads a kernel module but nothing else does.

Please correct me if im wrong but as i understand it.
GFS and OCFS2 are  for file systems accessing
a shared storage array.   glusterfs is more for machines
that have their own direct attached storage, but no  shared
storage array.

Please let me know how your FC6 experience with
glusterfs is.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]