[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gluster-devel] Best configuration for a simple redundant 2 server glust
[Gluster-devel] Best configuration for a simple redundant 2 server glusterfs volume?
Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:22:49 +0100
I'm still a little confused as to what the best option currently is to
have a simple setup with 2 glusterfs servers which would achieve both
redundancy and load-balancing.
The "complex" solution seems to create two main volumes plus one
namespace volume on each server, then use afr to have 3 RAID-1 type
volumes, then unify the two main ones, using the other as the
namespace. This seems overkill, and means that all replication "goes
through" the clients. This also only provides redundancy (failover) if
the clients are pointed to a hostname resolving to both server's IP
addresses. It also "splits" the files on each server to achieve
round-robin, which again seems overkill to me.
The "simple" solution is to create one main volume on each server, then
use some external tool to sync files between both servers (rsync,
csync2...), then use the same hostname to multiple IP addresses trick.
The biggest downside here is that files aren't immediately available,
since they're created on only one of the servers.
My ideal solution would have :
- Clients access the servers using rr or any other algorithm.
- Clients stop accessing a given server if they can't use it anymore.
- Servers replicate their data directly between each other.
Am I missing any better solution in 1.3.x?
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora release 8 (Werewolf) - Linux kernel 126.96.36.199-85.fc8
Load : 0.48 0.53 0.50
- [Gluster-devel] Best configuration for a simple redundant 2 server glusterfs volume?,
Matthias Saou <=