Re: [Gluster-devel] RPM re-structuring

[Jay Vyas]

minor point: rot-13 is a good one for learning and playing with gluster.  i 
would suggest keeping it in the releases.!


On Jul 29, 2013, at 7:21 AM, "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" <address@hidden> wrote:

> On 07/28/2013 02:18 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> There was a recent thread on fedora-devel about bloated glusterfs
>> dependency for qemu:
>> 
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/186484.html
> 
> Yes, but it's all died away after it was explained properly.
> 
> 
>> As of today, we have the following packages and respective primary
>> constituents:
>> 
>>  1. glusterfs                 - contains all the common xlators,
>> libglusterfs, glusterfsd binary & glusterfs symlink to glusterfsd.
>>  2. glusterfs-rdma            - rdma shared library
>>  3. glusterfs-geo-replication - geo-rep related objects
>>  4. glusterfs-fuse            - fuse xlator
>>  5. glusterfs-server          - server side xlators, config files
>>  6. glusterfs-api             - libgfapi shared library
>>  7. glusterfs-resource-agents - OCF resource agents
>>  8. glusterfs-devel           - Header files for libglusterfs
>>  9. glusterfs-api-devel       - Header files for gfapi
>> 
>> As far as qemu is concerned, qemu depends on glusterfs-api which in turn
>> is dependent on glusterfs. Much of the apparent bloat is coming from
>> glusterfs package and one proposal for reducing the dependency footprint
>> of consumers of libgfapi could be the following:
>> 
>> a) Move glusterfsd and glusterfs symlink from 'glusterfs' to
>> 'glusterfs-server'
> 
> We can't do that, it'll break the "client-side". You can't do a client 
> glusterfs mount without glusterfs at least.....
> 
>> b) Package glusterfsd binary and glusterfs symlink in 'glusterfs-fuse'
> 
> Okay, but the glusterfsd binary is only about 80k — that's tiny — and the 
> symlink is only a few bytes.
> 
> And having the same bits in two RPMs could be a problem. I'll have to try it 
> for myself and see, or perhaps Niels already knows, but I'd be worried that 
> if I have both glusterfs-server and glusterfs-fuse installed and I uninstall 
> -fuse it might remove them and break things. Not that anyone should uninstall 
> -fuse without uninstalling -server.
> 
>> c) Kaleb mentioned about removing geo-replication objects from
>> 'glusterfs' and having them in 'glusterfs-geo-replication' only. I think
>> that might help unless we are breaking something in geo-replication by
>> doing so. Do we remember the original intent behind packaging
>> geo-replication objects in the 'glusterfs' package?
> 
> That's already in process for Fedora, and will soon be proposed for the 
> glusterfs.spec.in as well.
> 
>> d) Remove mac-compat.so, rot-13.so, symlink-cache.so from 'glusterfs'.
>> As practically nobody uses these translators today, I don't see much
>> value in packaging them.
> 
> Good suggestion.
> 
> -- 
> 
> Kaleb
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel