Re: [Gm2] CHAR = "signed char"?

[Gaius Mulley]

John O Goyo <address@hidden> writes:

> Gauis:
> 
> In my (slow but not stopped) investigation of the Solaris woes, I note
> that CHAR is considered "signed char" for debug purposes.  Why this
> and not "unsigned char"?
> 
> Sincerely,
> john

Hi John,

I confess I wasn't sure what CHAR should map onto..  but now that I've
reread the ISO m2 standard I think you are right - it implies unsigned
char - will fix it..

thanks for the bug report.  I'm also in the process of fixing the
option names for gm2 - to comply with gcc - ie to use -W only for
warnings and -f for almost everything else,

regards,
Gaius