[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnash-dev] Re: about multithreads
From: |
Sandro Santilli |
Subject: |
[Gnash-dev] Re: about multithreads |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 02:54:03 +0200 |
[gnash-dev added for sanity]
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 06:08:08PM -0600, Rob Savoye wrote:
> Sandro Santilli wrote:
>
> > So, should we really prefer "SDL-managed" version of code ?
> > I'd rather keep the codebase as simple as possible...
>
> We could potentially use SDL threads as I think we can use that
> without the rest of SDL. I don't really like SDL though. I'd prefer to
> be using FLTK and straight POSIX threads were possible.
I'm for straight POSIX threads too.
> > As a test, we might use an USE_SDL_THREADS define rather then
> > HAVE_SDL_H to switch between the two codes so you can see
> > what happen... what do you think ?
>
> We can add that pretty easily.
I changed HAVE_SDL_H to USE_SDL_THREADS and set USE_SDL_THREADS
if HAVE_SDL_H is defined and REALLY_USE_SDL_THREADS is defined too :)
By default the latter is undefined, let's just see if anyone has problems.
--strk;
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Gnash-dev] Re: about multithreads,
Sandro Santilli <=