[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash-dev] Help with building a XPI
From: |
Sylvain Beucler |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash-dev] Help with building a XPI |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:30:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 05:49:54PM -0600, Rob Savoye wrote:
> Sylvain Beucler wrote:
>
> > You might be interested in reading my custom scripts that I use to
> > make FreeDink snapshots and releases:
> > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/freedink.git/tree/autobuild
> > (also available at http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/)
>
> Interesting... btw, the links to all the docs appear to be 404s... :-)
I don't see which ones you mean, can you give me an example?
> > There were discussion on gnu-prog-discuss some months ago about tools
> > that are a bit more structured, but I haven't investigated.
>
> I wound up using reprepro, which seems to do the trick. and runs on
> RedHat Enterprise as well. See it this works for you:
>
> deb http://www.getgnash.org/deb-repo lenny main
> GPG key: http://www.getgnash.org/deb-repo/gnashdev.key
>
> If that works, I'll add the buildbot generated .debs and from
> http://getgnash.org/buildfarm/ to the repos in an automated fashion as I
> beat buildbot into shape.
OK, so:
- the versionning is "trunk$(date +%Y%m%d)-y" but Debian's are
0.8.x-y. It would make sense to use compatible versions, and allow a
release to have higher priority than an earlier snapshot
- the suite is 'unstable' while it's a Lenny (stable) package. This
blocked the upgrade for me because I give 'unstable' a lower
priority in /etc/apt/preferences (hence I can hand-pick unstable
packages while remaining stable for the rest). So for a stable
repository it makes sense to use the 'stable' suite.
- apparently the files are not split exactly the same, since when
upgrading, I got:
dpkg : erreur de traitement de
/var/cache/apt/archives/gnash_trunk20090313_i386.deb (--unpack) :
tentative de remplacement de « /usr/share/pixmaps/gnash.xpm », qui appartient
aussi au paquet gnash-common
dpkg-deb: sous-processus paste tué par le signal (Relais brisé (pipe))
(i.e. gnash.xpm is in gnash while it was in gnash-common) This isn't
very important as the error disappears after relaunching apt-get .
- and well, more importantly :)
$ gtk-gnash
gtk-gnash: error while loading shared libraries: libgnashnet.so.0: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
Apparently the file isn't present. /usr/lib/gnash/ files also lack
the version-less symlinks
> > How can I help?
>
> It depends, ever hack on buildbot ? Want to overload yourself with
> more sysadmin projects ? :-)
Why not, this could be an opportunity to update my own setup.
I was also asking about XPI though. IMHO distro repos are fine, but
are suboptimal if it's possible to provide statically-linked,
one-click-install binaries.
--
Sylvain
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Help with building a XPI, (continued)
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Help with building a XPI, Rob Savoye, 2009/04/06
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Help with building a XPI, Sylvain Beucler, 2009/04/06
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Help with building a XPI, Sylvain Beucler, 2009/04/07
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Help with building a XPI, Rob Savoye, 2009/04/07
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Help with building a XPI, Sylvain Beucler, 2009/04/08
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Help with building a XPI, Sylvain Beucler, 2009/04/10
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Help with building a XPI, Sylvain Beucler, 2009/04/10
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Help with building a XPI, Rob Savoye, 2009/04/11
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Help with building a XPI, Sylvain Beucler, 2009/04/12
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Help with building a XPI, Rob Savoye, 2009/04/12
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Help with building a XPI,
Sylvain Beucler <=
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Help with building a XPI, Rob Savoye, 2009/04/14
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Help with building a XPI, Sylvain Beucler, 2009/04/14
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Help with building a XPI, Rob Savoye, 2009/04/15