[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnash-dev] Stable branch of Gnash

From: Bastiaan Jacques
Subject: Re: [Gnash-dev] Stable branch of Gnash
Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 13:54:47 +0200 (CEST)
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)

In my opinion it is necessary to have some sort of review policy, if we
want to keep our developers together (which we all do, I think). While
fixing the testsuite and having things compile are very useful, it does
not solve the problem of (tree-wide) code quality degradation. I think a
review policy could solve most of that problem. Such a policy would be
especially important where large-scale changes are contemplated.


On Fri, 21 May 2010, John Gilmore wrote:

 *  We figure out why Rob's pre-checkin test runs are not showing
    things that Benjamin's post-checkin test runs make obvious.
 *  We keep the tree compiling and passing its test suite almost
    every day.
 *  If we have really made youtube usable with the hacks and kludges
    about plugin reporting of version numbers, etc, then I hope we
    can cut a release sometime soon, so the distros can pick it up as
    an update and make gnash usable for the most popular video site.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]