[gNewSense-users] Correct referencing of suspected non-free

[Chris Andrew]

All,

I have logged-on this morning to see that Matt has done some great work, on the suspected non-free page.  He has completed his entries in the table listing suspected non-free packages.

On the down-side, this has created more bugs.  On the more worthwhile upside, if we don't have a record of problems, then we don't have any hope of finding solutions.

We now have more than 50% of the suspected non-free reported as bugs.  Can the people that entered the remaining packages please revisit the table.  I suspect this is some of the earlier members of the project.  If this isn't done, we'll have to consider either asking people to adopt a suspected problem (which they didn't raise), or question whether this problem should have been noted in the first place.

Once again, thanks to Matt :-) .

Cheers,

Chris.