gnewsense-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gNewSense-users] Texlive/diagram.tex nonfree - WAS: (no subject)


From: Karl Goetz
Subject: Re: [gNewSense-users] Texlive/diagram.tex nonfree - WAS: (no subject)
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:13:00 +0930

On Sun, 12 Jul 2009 14:50:50 -0700
David Sterry <address@hidden> wrote:

> Sam Geeraerts wrote:
> > Karl Goetz schreef:
> >> If people want any of the following packages, a patch to remove
> >> just the file would be nice. Otherwise I'll remove it/them next
> >> week. Binary: texlive-bibtex-extra, texlive-formats-extra,
> >> texlive-generic-extra, texlive-math-extra, texlive-plain-extra,
> >> texlive-latex-extra, texlive-latex3, texlive-fonts-extra,
> >> texlive-games, texlive-pstricks, texlive-publishers,
> >> texlive-humanities, texlive-science, texlive-fonts-extra-doc,
> >> texlive-pstricks-doc, texlive-publishers-doc, texlive-science-doc,
> >> texlive-latex-extra-doc, texlive-humanities-doc
> >> kk
> >
> > I have python-matplotlib installed, which indirectly depends on
> > some of these packages. I'll see what I can do for a patch.
> > Removing it one way or another is of course more important than
> > removing it conveniently, so don't let me hold you back.
> How did you know you had packages that depended upon these? What
> command did you run to check? Or did you just know?
> 
> 
'aptitude why' is one way:
aptitude why aptitude
i   tasksel Depends aptitude (>= 0.2.15-1)


-- 
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]