[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gNewSense-users] Suggestion
From: |
al3xu5 / dotcommon |
Subject: |
Re: [gNewSense-users] Suggestion |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:15:32 +0200 |
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:29:49 +0200, Manolinux <address@hidden>
wrote:
> Maybe there is some explanation to substituted documentation.
>
> Much of software documentation is done with the GFDL license. This
> license allows invariant sections (parts of the document which you are
> not allowed to modify), which according to Debian guidelines are non
> free, and cannot be included.
>
> Maybe this is the documentation Victor was talking about, I'm almost
> sure that emacs manual are in GFDL license. Another example are the
> info pages, which in Debian are copies of man pages.
>
> More info:
>
> http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001
they debated GFDL issues about invariant sections, transparent copies,
drm... finally they voted to choose one of these options:
- Option 1 "GFDL-licensed works are unsuitable for main in all cases"
- Option 2 "GFDL-licensed works without unmodifiable sections are free"
- Option 3 "GFDL-licensed works are compatible with the DFSG"
- Option 4 "Further discussion"
and the winner was:
-Option 2 "GFDL-licensed works without unmodifiable sections are free"
now, take a look here:
http://www.debian.org/vote/2004/vote_002
the winner was:
- Option 2 "Choice 2: Re-affirm support for non-free"
and here:
http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_007
the winner was:
- Option 1 "Release Etch even with kernel firmware issues"
(as well known by gns and/or linuxlibre users, these issues are
things like binary blobs and/or drivers that induces or requires
installing additional pieces of non-free software)
so... it seems that debian policies consider having unmodifiable
sections in GFDL a more serious issue for freedom than having non-free
software in their repos or binary blobs in the linux kernel...
regards
al3xu5 / dotcommon
--
Support free software! Join FSF: http://www.fsf.org/jf?referrer=7535
______________________________________________________________________
Public GPG/PGP key block
ID: 1024D/11C70137
Fingerprint: 60F1 B550 3A95 7901 F410 D484 82E7 5377 11C7 0137
Key download: http://bitfreedom.noblogs.org/gallery/5721/dotcommon.asc
[ Please, do not send my key to any keyserver! ]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Suggestion, (continued)
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Suggestion, Karl Goetz, 2010/04/17
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Suggestion, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO, 2010/04/17
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Suggestion, Jason Self, 2010/04/17
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Suggestion, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO, 2010/04/18
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Suggestion, Karl Goetz, 2010/04/17
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Suggestion, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO, 2010/04/18
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Suggestion, Karl Goetz, 2010/04/19
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Suggestion, Manolinux, 2010/04/19
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Suggestion,
al3xu5 / dotcommon <=
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Suggestion, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO, 2010/04/19
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Suggestion, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO, 2010/04/19