Re: [gNewSense-users] What part of Debian is nonfree?

[Karl Goetz]

On Sat, 14 May 2011 19:57:35 +0100
Michael Dorrington <address@hidden> wrote:

> On 14/05/11 18:06, Michał Masłowski wrote:
> >> Surprisingly, you might want to include some of the packages from
> >> Debian's non-free repository as they were moved to 'non-free'
> >> because they are under the GFDL licence which is considered
> >> DFSG-incompatible.
> >> http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses#Licenses_that_are_DFSG-incompatible
> >> I don't know what gNewSense's position is on the GFDL.
> > 
> > We do include/plan to include them,
> > http://www.gnewsense.org/Projects/DocRejectedByDebian.
> 
> This will make gNewSense "non-free" from Debian's perspective.
> Certainly something to muse on.

We aim for FSF free, not debian free.
thanks,
kk

-- 
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature