Hi,
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 7:50 PM Ladislav Michl <
address@hidden> wrote:
> Sure, no problem. I read above you are fine with that approach in general.
Yes, overall it seems fine to me.
> However it would be nice if someone could actually give pachset a try.
> Preferably on non linux platforms.
I will on Windows and OS X once I'm done with travelling.
> > > -typedef void (*cfg_foreach_func)(const char *section, const char *key,
> > const char *value);
> > > -void cfg_foreach(const char *section, cfg_foreach_func func);
> > > +#define cfg_foreach_entry(section, header, entry) \
> > > + for (; header != NULL; header = header->next) \
> > > + if (strcmp(section, h->section) == 0) \
> > > + for (entry = h->entries; entry != NULL; entry =
> > entry->next)
> >
> > Why that?
>
> If that question leads to opencoding that single macro use, I'm fine
> with that.
Yes, that's what I've meant. Sorry for not being clear.
Cheers,
Paweł
--
Pawel Kot