gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert upd


From: Jonathan Walther
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 02:59:17 -0700
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 11:30:45AM +0200, Alexander Deruwe wrote:
So the responder fucked up, what about it?  Please, give it a rest.

I sent the mentioned reply.  Miles is right here: I replied using 'r'
instead of 'g' (group reply), so it's really my own fault.
It can probably be attributed to it being the first list message after
my vacation. :)

(Heh, I just realize I started this reply with 'r' too, so I'll have to
correct before sending. ;)

Not everyone uses mutt.  Pine, elm, Eudora, even Outlook Express are
common mail clients, and none of them have a concept of "group reply".
Email is one of those things that should "just work".  Remember TCP
supplanted the "official" OSI standard networking protocols.  I want
email to just work.

Jonathan

--

It's not true unless it makes you laugh, but you don't understand it until it makes you weep.
   -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

                    Geek House Productions, Ltd.

 Providing Unix & Internet Contracting and Consulting,
 QA Testing, Technical Documentation, Systems Design & Implementation,
 General Programming, E-commerce, Web & Mail Services since 1998

Phone:   604-435-1205
Email:   address@hidden
Webpage: http://reactor-core.org
Address: 2459 E 41st Ave, Vancouver, BC  V5R2W2

Attachment: pgpO3RodBOLwM.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]