[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert upd
From: |
Ethan Benson |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Aug 2003 23:37:41 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 07:56:37AM -0700, Robert Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 03:05, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 02:59:17AM -0700, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> >
> > > Not everyone uses mutt. Pine, elm, Eudora, even Outlook Express are
> > > common mail clients, and none of them have a concept of "group reply".
> >
> > that is complete and utter bullshit. EVERY SINGLE ONE of those listed
> > mailers supports group reply.
> >
> > stop lying to try and get your way.
>
> I'm guessing he thought "group reply" was different from "reply all"
> which all of these have. I thought so when I read the message, too.
>
> Here's my humble contribution to this:
>
> "User expectations" aside for the moment: I think the default action
> for this mailing list ought to be "reply to list, but not to original
> sender." Discussion should be on-list by default. Agree?
>
> With the current setup, if I do "reply" I get the original sender's
> email. Not what I want.
>
> If I do "reply all" I get the list AND the original sender's email.
> That's not what I want, either.
>
> I have to do "reply all" and then go and cut out the sender's email.
> That's frustrating and annoying.
then get a real MUA and use List-Reply.
--
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
pgppJCmWEA0gq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Ethan Benson, 2003/08/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Robert Anderson, 2003/08/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Jan Harkes, 2003/08/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Robert Anderson, 2003/08/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] the dangers of no reply-to munging, Jan Harkes, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] the dangers of no reply-to munging, Jonathan Walther, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] the dangers of no reply-to munging, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, MJ Ray, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update,
Ethan Benson <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Miles Bader, 2003/08/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, markj, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Robert Collins, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Robert Anderson, 2003/08/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Robert Collins, 2003/08/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/21
- Message not available
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Miles Bader, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/22